I’ve had the opportunity to conduct two focus groups in Santa Ana and Manchon. There were mostly mothers in both focus groups. Both focus groups lasted about 45 minutes, and I was able to gain a deeper understanding of the community and their habits because of the open ended format of the focus group. In contrast with the individual interviews, I was able to diverge from the pre-formed questions when something interesting was said and able to learn more about the problem that is affecting the community. Many answers were similar in both communities. They all believed they were susceptible to the problem, thought the problem was serious, knew brushing could prevent cavities, believed it was socially acceptable to brush and did not think it was god’s will that people got cavities. The answers differed when we talked about the actual habits though. In Santa Ana, all the participants said they brushed their teeth three times a day and so did their children. They also said their children knew how to brush teeth properly and brushed for a long enough time. It gave the impression that everything was fine (I do not have data of the number of children with cavities in the specific community to confirm this.) In Manchon, on the other hand, the parents admitted that they and their kids only brushed their teeth twice a day and often brushed too quickly, hurriedly and not properly. They also said the children sometimes don’t know that cavities are serious because parents are busy with other problems to teach them. They also admitted that many of their children had cavities. With consideration to the sample size, this still raises the question of why two communities so close together, about 2 km, gave such different answers?
At first glance at all the results from my focus groups and individual interviews, I think the problem with cavities stems from 4 reasons: inadequate technique in brushing teeth, insufficient amount of time spent brushing teeth, acquisition of cavities at a young age and using an ineffective alternative to the use of toothpaste. First, I believe the technique of brushing could be inadequate in the nearby communities. In both the focus groups I conducted, people recalled and demonstrated a completely different technique for brushing their teeth. Second, as people in Manchon mentioned, people could be spending very little time brushing their teeth even if they brushed their teeth atleast twice a day. Third, children could have acquired cavities at a young age, since parents do not think cavities are serious at a young age and dental hygiene is not enforced. Neglected cavities at a young age could affect the growing permanent teeth underneath. Fourth, people often do not have paste, so they brush their teeth with water and salt. I was not aware of this until I came here, but it is often difficult for community members to buy paste on a consistent basis. Either they cannot afford it or do not allocate funds to it because they believe water with salt is a equally effective alternative. With no fluoridated water, the use of water and salt means that the community members do not acquire fluoride to enforce their teeth at all. Although the water with salt has been enforced in talks and presentations as an effective alternative by all kinds of non profit and ngo organizations in Nicaragua, I'm not sure if it is effective. Even if it is effective, I'm not sure if they use the right kind (sea salt is the most effective I think) or the right amount. More research needs to be done on this.



